-prefix-free lets you use only unprefixed CSS properties everywhere. It works behind the scenes, adding the current browser’s prefix to any CSS code, only when it’s needed.
“[-prefix-free is] fantastic, top-notch work! Thank you for creating and sharing it.”
— Eric Meyer
<link> or <style> elements and adds a vendor prefix where neededstyle attribute and adds a vendor prefix where needed<link> or <style> elements, style attribute changes and CSSOM changes (requires plugin).css() method get and set unprefixed properties (requires plugin)@import-ed files is not supportedstyle attribute) won’t work in IE and Firefox < 3.6. Properties as well in Firefox < 3.6.Check this page’s stylesheet ;-)
You can also visit the Test Drive page, type in any code you want and check out how it would get prefixed for the current browser.
Just include prefixfree.js anywhere in your page. It is recommended to put it right after the stylesheets, to minimize FOUC
That’s it, you’re done!
The target browser support is IE9+, Opera 10+, Firefox 3.5+, Safari 4+ and Chrome on desktop and Mobile Safari, Android browser, Chrome and Opera Mobile on mobile.
If it doesn’t work in any of those, it’s a bug so please report it. Just before you do, please make sure that it’s not because the browser doesn’t support a CSS3 feature at all, even with a prefix.
In older browsers like IE8, nothing will break, just properties won’t get prefixed. Which wouldn’t be useful anyway as IE8 doesn’t support much CSS3 ;)
Test the prefixing that -prefix-free would do for this browser, by writing some CSS below:
Microsoft Access Runtime 2003 is a remarkable piece of software engineering that has kept business databases running for over two decades. But every year, driver support, printer compatibility, and security risks worsen. If your organization relies on it, create a long-term migration plan.
| Requirement | Minimum | |-------------|---------| | | Windows 2000 SP3 / XP / Server 2003 | | CPU | 233 MHz or faster | | RAM | 128 MB (256 MB recommended) | | Disk space | 180 MB | | Other | Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 (included) |
Upsizing to SQL Server: Moving the data to SQL Server while keeping the Access frontend can improve performance and data integrity.
Microsoft Access Runtime 2003 is a useful tool for distributing Access applications to users who do not need the full functionality of Microsoft Access 2003. While it has its limitations, the runtime version provides a cost-effective and easy-to-deploy solution for sharing Access databases. By understanding the features, benefits, and limitations of Microsoft Access Runtime 2003, developers and organizations can make informed decisions about its use and deployment.
You might wonder why anyone would seek out software from 2003. The reasons are practical, not nostalgic:
Microsoft Access Runtime 2003 is a remarkable piece of software engineering that has kept business databases running for over two decades. But every year, driver support, printer compatibility, and security risks worsen. If your organization relies on it, create a long-term migration plan.
| Requirement | Minimum | |-------------|---------| | | Windows 2000 SP3 / XP / Server 2003 | | CPU | 233 MHz or faster | | RAM | 128 MB (256 MB recommended) | | Disk space | 180 MB | | Other | Microsoft Data Access Components 2.8 (included) | microsoft access runtime 2003
Upsizing to SQL Server: Moving the data to SQL Server while keeping the Access frontend can improve performance and data integrity. Microsoft Access Runtime 2003 is a remarkable piece
Microsoft Access Runtime 2003 is a useful tool for distributing Access applications to users who do not need the full functionality of Microsoft Access 2003. While it has its limitations, the runtime version provides a cost-effective and easy-to-deploy solution for sharing Access databases. By understanding the features, benefits, and limitations of Microsoft Access Runtime 2003, developers and organizations can make informed decisions about its use and deployment. | Requirement | Minimum | |-------------|---------| | |
You might wonder why anyone would seek out software from 2003. The reasons are practical, not nostalgic: