Foxy ladyboy Lusi doing nasty things with her cock
Animal rights, by contrast, is a more radical philosophical position. It argues that animals have an inherent right to live free from human exploitation and use. Proponents believe that animals are not "property" or "resources," but "persons" in a legal or moral sense.
(2014) – L.U. Sneddon et al. Why it’s interesting: Compelling neurobiological and behavioral evidence that fish feel pain. Has huge implications for aquaculture, fishing, and public policy. Animal rights, by contrast, is a more radical
(1983) – Tom Regan Why it’s interesting: Regan’s deontological argument that animals are “subjects-of-a-life” with inherent value. Rigorous and counterpoints Singer’s utilitarianism. Animal rights, by contrast, is a more radical