-prefix-free lets you use only unprefixed CSS properties everywhere. It works behind the scenes, adding the current browser’s prefix to any CSS code, only when it’s needed.
“[-prefix-free is] fantastic, top-notch work! Thank you for creating and sharing it.”
— Eric Meyer
<link> or <style> elements and adds a vendor prefix where neededstyle attribute and adds a vendor prefix where needed<link> or <style> elements, style attribute changes and CSSOM changes (requires plugin).css() method get and set unprefixed properties (requires plugin)@import-ed files is not supportedstyle attribute) won’t work in IE and Firefox < 3.6. Properties as well in Firefox < 3.6.Check this page’s stylesheet ;-)
You can also visit the Test Drive page, type in any code you want and check out how it would get prefixed for the current browser.
Just include prefixfree.js anywhere in your page. It is recommended to put it right after the stylesheets, to minimize FOUC
That’s it, you’re done!
The target browser support is IE9+, Opera 10+, Firefox 3.5+, Safari 4+ and Chrome on desktop and Mobile Safari, Android browser, Chrome and Opera Mobile on mobile.
If it doesn’t work in any of those, it’s a bug so please report it. Just before you do, please make sure that it’s not because the browser doesn’t support a CSS3 feature at all, even with a prefix.
In older browsers like IE8, nothing will break, just properties won’t get prefixed. Which wouldn’t be useful anyway as IE8 doesn’t support much CSS3 ;)
Test the prefixing that -prefix-free would do for this browser, by writing some CSS below:
: Because these acts were highly illegal in the UK, the video became a legendary urban myth in the 1980s, often confused with the George Orwell novel of the same name.
The narration was followed by a series of scenes that seemed both familiar and unsettling. The animals were not merely actors; they were puppets, their strings pulled by unseen hands. Yet the faces of the puppeteers were never shown—only their silhouettes moving against a backdrop of old farm tools and rusted fences.
This review aims to provide a balanced assessment of the video adaptation, focusing on its production qualities, faithfulness to the source material, and thematic resonance.
The projector whirred to a stop. Lena sat in the dim light, the hum of the machine echoing the thrum of her heartbeat. She had stumbled upon a hidden masterpiece, a lost work of a filmmaker who had vanished from the public eye shortly after the film’s creation.
Lena’s eyes widened. “How—”
: Because these acts were highly illegal in the UK, the video became a legendary urban myth in the 1980s, often confused with the George Orwell novel of the same name.
The narration was followed by a series of scenes that seemed both familiar and unsettling. The animals were not merely actors; they were puppets, their strings pulled by unseen hands. Yet the faces of the puppeteers were never shown—only their silhouettes moving against a backdrop of old farm tools and rusted fences. animal farm video bodil joensen 1981l top
This review aims to provide a balanced assessment of the video adaptation, focusing on its production qualities, faithfulness to the source material, and thematic resonance. : Because these acts were highly illegal in
The projector whirred to a stop. Lena sat in the dim light, the hum of the machine echoing the thrum of her heartbeat. She had stumbled upon a hidden masterpiece, a lost work of a filmmaker who had vanished from the public eye shortly after the film’s creation. Yet the faces of the puppeteers were never
Lena’s eyes widened. “How—”